Tuesday, May 28, 2024

Pakistan’s Approach to Afghan Migrants Draws International Scrutiny

Immigration News

Detained Afghan refugees arrive at a police station in Karachi on November 2, 2023, following a police operation against illegal Afghan immigrants. – More than 165,000 Afghans have fled Pakistan since Islamabad issued an ultimatum to 1.7 million people a month ago to leave or face arrest and deportation, officials said on November 2. (Photo by Asif HASSAN / AFP)

The handling of Afghan refugees by Pakistani authorities has caught the attention of the international community. According to a statement released on October 17, 2023, by experts from the UN Human Rights Council, there are calls to stop the forcible repatriation of undocumented Afghan migrants due to concerns for their safety upon returning to Afghanistan. This response comes after Pakistan’s announcement of an order that could affect all undocumented immigrants, which is said to include approximately 1.7 million Afghan nationals, instructing them to leave the country by November 1, 2023, or risk deportation.

Before proceeding with the narrative that Pakistan has a “callous” or “insensitive” attitude, it is important to note the country’s long history of hosting Afghan refugees. According to UNHCR data, Pakistan has been a host to millions of Afghans for several decades, often with limited international support.

The UN Human Rights Council experts expressed concern for the welfare of these individuals, especially those who had fled Afghanistan following the Taliban’s resurgence in power in August 2021. The subsequent societal restrictions, particularly impacting women’s rights to education and employment, are part of the considerations of safety upon their return.

UN agencies, including the International Organization for Migration and the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, have appealed to Pakistan to reconsider the deportations, citing the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan. While respecting Pakistan’s sovereign right to implement its immigration policies, these agencies have emphasized the necessity for returns to be voluntary, safe, and dignified, without coercion.

Furthermore, UN special rapporteurs have urged Pakistan to adhere to the principle of non-refoulement, which is a core tenet of international refugee law that prohibits the return of individuals to a country where they may face persecution. Reports of arrests and alleged ill-treatment of Afghans in Pakistan since the announcement of the repatriation plans have been met with concern, emphasizing the lack of formal asylum laws in Pakistan, which does not absolve it from its international obligations.

In the international political arena, some U.S. political figures, including the Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Michael McCaul, have reportedly expressed disapproval of the situation. Accusations of corruption within the Pakistani immigration system and potential implications for Pakistan-US relations have been mentioned, although such allegations would require substantial evidence for confirmation.

On the ground, Afghan refugees have reported experiences of detention, harassment, and mistreatment, which are grave concerns that merit attention and investigation. Claims of property demolition and confiscation by Pakistani authorities, as stated by Mir Ahmad Rauf, head of the Afghan Refugees’ Council in Pakistan, highlight the seriousness of the situation.

In Kabul, the Taliban government has indicated that the treatment of Afghan refugees could negatively affect bilateral relations with Pakistan. This adds to the complex diplomatic relations between the two nations following the change of power in Afghanistan in 2021.

The accurate representation of such sensitive issues requires balanced reporting and verification of all claims. It’s important to acknowledge the contributions and burdens borne by host countries while also holding them accountable to international standards of human rights and refugee protection. The situation remains dynamic, and the international community’s engagement is crucial in seeking a resolution that respects both the rights of migrants and the sovereignty of nations.

DISCLAIMERThe opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of The Khaama Press News Agency. We welcome opinions and submissions to Khaama Press Opinions/Exclusives – Please email them to info@khaama.com.

- Advertisement -

More articles


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here
Captcha verification failed!
CAPTCHA user score failed. Please contact us!

- Advertisement -

The World News